Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMehdizadeh, Shahlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorApplebaum, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Ian M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStraker, Jane K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-06T15:21:56Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-10T15:15:40Z
dc.date.available2012-09-06T15:21:56Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-07-10T15:15:40Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-06en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/4525en_US
dc.description.abstractIn sixteen years of tracking utilization trends for institutional and home-and community-based services and supports, we learned that Ohio has made considerable changes in its approach to delivering and funding long-term care. For example, in 2009 more than four in ten older people on Medicaid received services in a non-institutional setting.en_US
dc.subjectnursing home, PASSPORT, long-term care, long-term services and supports, Medicaiden_US
dc.titleComing of Age: Tracking the Progress and Challenges of Delivering Long-Term Services and Supports in Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationScripps Gerontology Centeren_US
dc.contributor.emailmehdizk@muohio.eduen_US
dc.contributor.emailapplebra@muohio.eduen_US
dc.contributor.emailnelsonim@muohio.eduen_US
dc.contributor.emailstrakejk@muohio.eduen_US
dc.date.published2011-06en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record