| dc.contributor.author |
Hurst, Susan |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Messner, Kevin |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Revelle, Andrew |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Shrimplin, Aaron |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-09-12T14:28:10Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2012-09-12T14:28:10Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2012-09-12 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
Shrimplin, Aaron; Revelle, Andy; Hurst, Susan; Messner, Kevin (2011) "Contradictions and Consensus - Clusters of Opinions on E-books" College & Research Libraries vol. 72 no. 2 181-190 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2374.MIA/4527 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Q methodology was used to determine attitudes and opinions about e-books among a group of faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates at Miami University of Ohio. Oral interviews formed the basis for a collection of opinion statements concerning e-books versus print. These statements were then ranked by a second group of research participants. Factor analysis of these rankings found four distinct factors that reveal clusters of opinions on e-books: Book Lovers, Technophiles, Pragmatists, and Printers. Two of the four factors take a more ideological approach in their understanding of e-books: Book Lovers have an emotional attachment to the printed book as an object, while Technophiles feel just as strongly about technology. In contrast, the other two factors are more utilitarian: Printers might find e-books more palatable if usability were improved, while Pragmatists are comfortable with both print and e-book formats. |
en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof |
http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/2/181.abstract |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
e-books |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
q methodology |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Contradictions and Consensus: Clusters of Opinions on E-books |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
| dc.date.published |
2009-03 |
|
| dc.relation.journal |
College & Research Libraries |
en_US |